MASTS is made by and for its members
Search
Close this search box.

Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland

Latest

The latest updates from our community

Vacancy

PhD Studentship: Nature Protection Versus Nature Restoration: Who Benefits and Who Loses Out? University of Essex

Qualification Type: PhD
Location: Colchester
Funding for: UK Students, Self-funded Students
Funding amount: Living costs stipend at the UK Research and Innovation recommended level per year. The stipend for 2024-25 is £19,237. The rate for 2025-26 TBA.
Hours: Full Time
Placed On: 21st November 2024
Closes: 7th February 2025
Reference: 11370 Life Sci_Sociology Oct 2025

Project Overview

This is an opportunity to conduct fully funded interdisciplinary research under the ‘Sustainable Transitions – Leverhulme Doctoral Training Programme’ at the University of Essex.

Decisions around whether to use limited conservation funding to protect “good” ecosystems or improve degraded ones are typically based upon economic and ecological considerations alone. Yet there are numerous potential ways in which this decision not only determines the costs and ecological benefits of conservation activities, but also the social outcomes. For example, in Europe and North America, nature protection almost certainly involves a greater focus on predominantly white rural populations and relatively affluent suburban areas. Cash for conservation in urban areas has the potential to benefit a wider diversity of the population. Examples could include creating wildlife-rich habitats within city parks or restoring natural forms and processes in urban rivers. But, even in built-up areas, the social benefits of investment in nature may not be shared equitably with regards to ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, and sexuality. Integrating social justice into conservation poses challenges as policymakers and planners typically rely on top-down decision making, while social outcomes are heavily influenced by local (“bottom-up”) processes. Connecting conservation efforts with nature-based education can enhance the resilience and wellbeing of local communities. Research on indigenous communities is more nuanced, with some studies indicating negative mental and physical health impacts of conservation due to displacement. Further interdisciplinary research in this area is urgently needed to support more holistic conservation decision making.

Interdisciplinary Focus and Methods

This PhD project will take a critical ecological approach to assess how conservation decision making influences social outcomes. Supported by supervisors specialising in statistical ecology and both quantitative and qualitative sociology, you will seek interdisciplinary synthesis by combining large-scale modelling of social and ecological systems with place-based research involving the use of qualitative methodologies such as focus groups, interviews, and questionnaires.

Person Specification

This opportunity would suit a candidate with a degree/ background in conservation science and statistical modelling, as well as a keen interest in developing skills in quantitative and qualitative sociology.

It is not necessary for the candidate to have prior training in social sciences methodologies as this will be provided on the programme.

More details & Apply here

 

MASTS Resources

We’re working behind the scenes to bring you a suite of useful, and updateable, resources including: 

  • Find an expert
  • Find facilities & equipment
  • MASTS Publications

 

If you would like to be updated when the resources section is live please let us know.